So what must be done? We need to build a new, dynamic and healthy movement based on the creed of the superman, the march of the titan. For too long now, the so-called white power movement has consisted of mainly misfits and social rejects. One only has to look at the white power movement in the USA, to see how off-track our cause has gone.
Young people who believe they are Skinhead soldiers of the racial holy war, when in fact they are embarrassing fools and losers. Now I am not saying they are not well intentioned, nor white men dedicated to the cause of racial survival, but they look pathetic and act similarly. If our race has to rely on swastika-tattooed skinheads to survive then we are finished…
We have all seen the people who dress up in the uniforms of armies of yesteryear and put on displays. These historical re-enactment groups have their political counter-part in those mis-guided individuals who want to appear in the apparel of the Third Reich, utilize its symbols and pretend that these have some current relevance to the contemporary political situation. These ‘political re-enactment’ enthusiasts have failed to grasp that their activities can only harm the nationalist cause. (or perhaps not…)
There are words that carry positive or negative connotations. These can change over time – in this day and age ‘democracy’ has positive connotations, in the eighteenth century it would have had negative. Today ‘discrimination’ is thought bad, in the last century it would have been ‘good’. In 1930s Germany ‘Nazi’ might have been regarded positively, today the opposite is true. Whether the holocaust happened at all, or six million Jews died in it, is irrelevant. The public perception is that it did – sixty years of media, repetition reinforce this perception. It would require a massive and lengthy saturation advertising campaign to make even the slightest dent in this impression. Ergo, it is political suicide to associate any organisation with the symbols, or language, of National Socialist Germany. It is for exactly this reason that opponents try to label any nationalist grouping ‘Nazi’ or ‘fascist’. Doubtless, this is the reason why the agents in place within the extreme right are so keen to accuse anyone attempting to steer the ‘movement’ away from Nazi symbols and ideology of backsliding.
We need to drop the ‘Nazi’ re-hash; Nazism perished at the gates of Stalingrad, and can never be resurrected. Those brave men, who fell fighting ‘Bolshevism’, will never be forgotten. Yet to try and emulate their roman salute is both futile, and counter-productive. In fact, watching some of these over-weight so-called examples of the master race is embarrassing. These people are either cranks with a fetish or government spies. No doubt there are some who don swastikas who are neither, but they may as well be for all the good they do the nationalist cause.
Hitler was first and foremost a German Nationalist – not a white power enthusiast. The white man’s hegemony had hitherto fore been taken as read – post-WWII it was seen as something to be challenged. This was part of the reaction against the holocaust. Leaving aside the mentally ill (it is quite common for sadistic psychopaths to learn German / collect Third Reich memorabilia; they enjoy the fantasised images of cruelty and control) no one attempts to justify or excuse it. The only alternative then is holocaust-denial. This then is an implicit acknowledgement of the immoral nature of the holocaust. Today the holocaust debate should be confined to historians, not politicians. It is irrelevant to contemporary socio-economic and political concerns – nationalists should maintain this position.
Skinheads with big bellies, seig-heiling and drunk as skunks, would have our predecessors turning in their graves. If Uncle Adolf could see the spectacle being carried out in his name, he would cringe in horror. Those brave Hitler youth who fell defending Berlin, from murdering, raping, Mongol savages, were true soldiers of the Rahowa (racial holy war). Unlike the sad specimens trying to emulate them today, they saw their duty and carried it out. Come on, those readers involved in the spectacle of so-called racial survival/white power, just sit back and think about what I am saying here. This has to stop, and stop now…
We need to think outside the box, come up with new ideas. We need something original and appealing, that the public can relate to in minutes. This has to be something focussed on what our race has achieved. Something with both a history and a future – not some cranky thought-up idea, that just makes us look stupid.
From the days of the Berserkers/Vikings, right up to the Waffen SS our people have shown their mettle. United under the banner of the white man, for white power, and adhering to the laws of nature, nothing could stop them.
For too long now, Nationalism has neglected the cultural side of our struggle, ignored the need to educate our people. They need to learn exactly who we are, why we must survive, and the consequences if we do not. We need to stop this nonsense- “we’re not racist, and it’s all about space not race.” This may work over the short term, but not in the long run. Eventually we are going to have to nail our colours to the mast and fight, before we are overwhelmed by the third world.
This we can only do if we now educate those people coming into our movement. They will then see what lies ahead and know what is expected of them. Our young people must be shown an alternative to drugs, booze and petty crime as lifestyle options. Get them involved in our cause – encourage them to train. In martial arts, climbing, running, and the sports, our ancestors engaged in from the days of ancient Greece onwards. School them about the courageous and successful exploits of their ancestors, the great white men who left these isles to carry civilization across the globe.
Our young people need a purpose in life, and only we can offer them this. Our enemies have millions of pounds to spend daily, brainwashing white people to be guilt-ridden and ashamed of their past. Nationalism cannot compete with EMI records or MTV, for the heart and soul of our people. Even trying to win kids over with music is largely futile, as in the White Power music scene. We should not try to compete with multi-million dollar industries like these, when we cannot even scratch the surface. We should point out the alien roots of such youth cults, and encourage the growth of healthy alternatives. We have the eternal laws of nature on our side, which cannot be defied indefinitely. We need to interpret these, and implement them in the correct manner.
We must acknowledge and accept our cultural hegemony. The world is euro-centric because the modern world was created by European ideas, efforts and ability. Altruistic motives and long term planning are the hallmarks of western man. Europe – and the USA (a European transplant) – came to dominate the world economy because of the internal strength of European culture. The common European values of work, thrift, honesty, patience, scepticism, and tenacity led to occidental world dominance. It did not happen by accident, or because of the exploitation of the Third World.
The American situation classically exemplifies how our cause has been misled, because of the path chosen by so-called saviours of our race. I mean, ‘Aryan Nations’ and ‘Church of the Creator’ – what in the world must desperate people think, when this is all the white man has to offer. Aryan Nations believes in Yahweh and other biblical nonsense. Church of the Creator members calls each other ‘Creators’ and their leader ‘Pontifex Maximus’. They concentrate their efforts on promoting/distributing their ‘bible’.
There may be complex socio-historical reasons why US activists tend to organise on a pseudo-religious/Para-military basis. The USA remains a country where 80% of the population believe in God, and the ‘religious right’ is a major political force. Now, I am not saying what the above organisations advocate in their books is not right, but they have wrapped their programme up in a philosophical packaging that appears cranky. By the time (if ever) you managed to sell this bill of goods to the British/European public (having undone decades of brainwashing) our cause would be lost.
The right to “keep and bear arms” is enshrined in the US constitution. The ‘minutemen’ militia, who contributed to American victory in the war of independence from Great Britain, are examples of citizen-soldiers battling government tyranny. There are no comparable UK historical parallels, which would justify para-military organization and activity.
There are two ways to influence people’s behaviour – persuasion or force. Politics or terrorism? The justification of violence remains its effectiveness. For example, in Ireland the success achieved by the ‘ballot box and armalite’ strategy. As James Connolly put it – “How beggarly appear words before a defiant deed.” However, the temptation towards violent action must be resisted. It is inimical to the best interests of our cause. It is a short cut that leads nowhere.
In any case infiltrated as any UK political group is by Special Branch informants/agents such a group carrying out organised activies of a Para-military nature would prove short-lived. Spontaneously organised cells, and individual’s practsing leaderless resistance, might fare better. However, their achievements would prove very limited devoid of any overt political wing – as they would by necessity be. There is little history of political violence in mainland UK (Ireland, both south and north, is another matter!) there is even less record of successful political violence… The history of the British state is one of concession in advance to avoid civil unrest – and repression to contain it. UK nationalists would only be justified in using physical force when no other way of expressing their political views was open to them. We are far from living in a totalitarian police state at present.
There is no supportive community to take refuge in – no sympathetic state nearby. There are recognisable historical explanations for the existence of a steady stream of recruits to the causes espoused by the various Para-military groups in Northern Ireland. There is no comparable positive aim or common goal that could galvanize nationalist recruiting on the mainland. An additional difficulty would be in identifying the ‘enemy’ to target – colored immigrants? left-wingers?, the political establishment? Without a readily identifiable foe, any organisation would be like a dog chasing its own tail.
Perhaps if the Loyalist groups had allied themselves to the radical right decades ago, something could have been achieved. However, they are one issue outfits, with a purely negative agenda – no union with the South. Their Loyalty is to a notion of Britishness that disappeared with the British Empire – they have nothing to contribute to the racial-nationalist struggle. Both the North and South of Ireland are part of the EU. There would be absolutely nothing to stop a million citizens of the Republic moving north tomorrow and registering to vote. History has moved on, whilst they have remained static.
The army and police generally recruit non-academic, conformist, conservative types – orders are to be obeyed quickly and unquestioningly. Those serving are socially isolated, with a careerist ethos. This is why the police fall over themselves to prosecute ‘hate crime’, and try to show how ‘inclusive’ they are… Why should nationalists try to re-invent the wheel? The existing forces of the state – the military, police and security services. These are what should be used to implement a nationalist agenda, rather than some ephemeral Para-military organization. He who controls the state determines their activities and priorities – the question then is how do we get to control the state?
White Separatism is another strand of thought in US nationalist circles. Colin Jordan advocates similar measures for the UK – forming communities of like-minded individuals. These would concentrate on educating themselves and children. While this might be economically viable as an option in the USA, where land prices are substantially less expensive than in the UK, it would leave the participants with even less influence on mainstream opinion. Nationalist activists already tend to be socially isolated. They exist in a goldfish bowl, or bubble – where others think/feel similarly. They do not engage with the real world – this explains their credulity/naivety. They are astonished by the casual anti-nomianism of the general population – binge drinking, drug taking, and graffiti-spraying litterlouts liable to kill you over a parking space…
The UK – like the USA- has suffered atrocities from Muslim fanatics – the main difference being those involved in the London attacks were born and bred here. Further outrages seem likely – a major Islamist atrocity could lead to civil disturbances: could the BNP take electoral advantage of such a situation? Is Nick Griffin the right man to lead a party that could?
Griffin seems to believe – like Orwell – that:’ If there is hope it lies with the Proles’.
He has been carefully courting disillusioned Labour voters, particularly in those de-industrialized towns with poor whites living close to Muslim populations. The social and economic decline of such areas makes it difficult to build any political organization there. There is a distinction to be drawn between absolute and relative poverty. Poverty is relative because need is relative to social institutions and practices. It is both a social problem, and an individual condition. In a ‘cycle of deprivation’, each circumstance of poverty reinforces another. The ‘culture of poverty’ ensures that sub-cultural values are transmitted from one generation to the next. Feelings of inevitability, rejecting hard work and educational attainment, seeking immediate gratification, not caring about the future. Typically, the poor display a low level of participation in community affairs.
Disenfranchised and disputatious, the lumpenproletariat come from segments of society economically deprived due to the collapse of family support systems and the lack of productive roles in society. They have little self-respect or social/class/race identity, and are pushed into a life of ignorance, corruption and degradation. These types congregate in gangs, become urban bandits and provoke riots and skirmishes. They indulge in drugs, alcohol, and deviant sexual behaviour and use a vulgar argot of insult and base sexuality. They may join in-group disturbances but lack political consciousness and incline towards destruction and looting. Governments or the mass media easily manipulate them. These are the 90-minute patriots whose attention span is limited to the duration of a football match.
There is no point in a little Englander mentality that clings to out-moded notions of tradition, and to the symbols of a parochial British nationalism, that does not recognise the vast and permanent changes to the international political landscape. The unskilled workforces in advanced capitalist countries have largely been replaced by the cheap labour of the developing world, or technology. It is pointless to bemoan this in an attempt to grab the disillusioned Labour voter. Perhaps a more intelligent strategy would be to woo discomfited Conservative voters… David Cameron is the Tories’ answer to Blair just when Blair is about to depart from the scene. He is all image and no substance, “compassionate conservatism” and ” social responsibility” do not have much resonance amongst the millions of provincial conservatives left without pride or purpose. The BNP could be an alternative for these, if it had a realistic chance of power… It is immaterial to the revival of Conservative electoral fortunes if the BNP appeal to voters in Labour heartlands. It is the marginal seats that count in UK General Elections, and there is little prospect of BNP advances there.
We need to go to the electorate with a sensible programme that doesn’t come across as if we intended to gas the Jews, and put every last non-white on a boat for shipment back to Africa. Nationalists know this is just nonsense that our enemies use against us – the British National Party is doing quite well at explaining this to a broader constituency. The very existence of an organization like the BNP manifests a basic lack of faith in the ability of the national political system to perceive and cope with economic, social and cultural issues during the transition to a post-industrial economy. However, unless proportional representation is introduced then it will be very difficult to win any measure of power or political influence.
If the rules of the game do not suit you, you can either refuse to play – and play a different game, or try to change the rules until they do suit you. Proportional representation – electoral reform – is the BNP’s main hope. The road to power lies in the adoption of PR, both for strategic and ideological reasons. The numbers of those likely to vote BNP are not concentrated in particular geographic locations (in sufficient strength) to make any difference. This is why both Conservative and Labour remain committed to our present ‘first-past-the-post’ system. This is also, why the Liberal party is in favour of electoral reform – all want to enjoy the spoils of office. It would make sense for BNP supporters to practice tactical voting – where a party’s majority is less than the vote of the main opposition party it would make sense for the third party’s supporters to vote for the runner-up to unseat their MP. It would make strategic sense for the BNP to try to get a Liberal government – committed to PR as the party is – voted into power!
With the ‘first past the post system’, it is virtually impossible for the BNP, or any minority party, to get an MP elected let alone form a government! It is the marginal constituencies that decide who forms the Government. 165 seats – 31 in the Midlands, 29 in the North, and 23 in London. Liverpool, Manchester, Sheffield, and Leeds – the great northern cities are solidly labour, with a scattering of marginals. I would venture to opine that there are more secularists and nominal Christians in this country than Muslims are. There are probably more ‘nationalists’ than Muslims. However, the Muslim numbers are concentrated in particular geographic locations. This means that they must be assiduously courted in marginal constituencies. Respect can get an MP elected but the BNP can’t? Similar demographics militate against us in many areas, making it nigh impossible to gain control of local councils.
If you cannot run the council and direct funds where they should go, then what is the point of standing? I know the BNP will be in a Catch 22 situation in some areas – do you stand and win as a lone councillor or not stand at all? People standing for office need to be properly trained for the job ahead of them, unlike some of those previously elected, who have encountered difficulties from day one. As time goes on, I am sure more people with the skills required to be good councillors will emerge from the party ranks. The question is to what long-term end?
It would make far more sense to stand only in Parliamentary elections, where any success would lead to a place in the seat of political power. It would be even more sensible to focus efforts on the European elections, where Proportional Representation would ensure that every BNP vote would count. The European parliament’s 732 MEPs are directly elected every five years, by proportional representation. 2009 is the next scheduled election, and 78 MEPs will be elected from the UK. The number of seats won by the European political parties in each country reflects the total number of votes each receives. UKIP, which favours British withdrawal from the EU, ironically enough get MEPs elected to the European parliament due to PR.
There are 1000+ days between UK General Elections, but important decisions are taken every day. There exists an inherent contradiction between direct (participatory) and representative democracy – in which we elect representatives to make decisions for us. The roots of European democracy can be traced back to Classical Greece. In Athens, only a few hundred people had the vote. Due to the massive growth of population, direct democracy became impractical, and representatives were elected to vote on behalf of the electorate. The Great Reform Act of 1832 extended the franchise to roughly 5% of the adult male British population. Successive legislation – in 1867, 1872 and 1884, gradually extended the vote to working people. Men over 21 and most women over 30 received the vote in 1918 (the ages were equalized in 1928) in 1969 the voting age was lowered from 21 to 18. Technological innovation could bring about a return to direct democracy. E-mail petitions, for example, illustrate the convergence of democracy and technology.
In Switzerland 50,000 people, signing a petition triggers a referendum on the subject. In the rejected EU constitution, 1Million signatures would have triggered action by the European parliament. It would be a simple matter to find a million EU citizens concerned about, for example, non-white immigration – and anxious to establish ‘Fortress Europe’… The way forward is in partnership with our European brethren, by European I mean in the broadest racial sense not the geographical. Therefore, I number the white commonwealth and – for the time being at any rate- the USA among our brothers. We have no time for the luxury of a parochial British nationalism – the survival of the race that took humankind from the swamps to the stars must surely take precedence over the ‘roast beef of olde England’… We must promote a sense of racial solidarity, a racial nationalism. Western man is at a crossroads – he can continue on the road leading to extinction, or seek out another route to travel.